Reading some of the blogs in class, it did become apparent that profit was a cause for concern. Really, how are these hyperlocal blogs going to make money through mostly hyperlocal advertising? I tried using the example I found in order to see if they were making anything out of the deal through their informal partnership with the Seattle Times. I checked out one of the participating hyperlocal blogs, and didn't find very much on the announcement of the partnership outlining the revenue goals, for obvious reasons. I found more interesting results in a business-oriented blog, on the part of John Cook's coverage of the partnership.
Cook doesn't announce anything groundbreaking-- he repeats the same phrasing that the official announcement did when it came to advertising: One of the goals is "Exploring tools that could enhance advertising opportunities across the partner sites." However, in the comments, things get a bit more interesting when a user says he thinks the passive banner ads are lame, and an employee of West Seattle Blog shows up. Apparently, even though one of the goals specifically says that they will explore new forms of advertising, according to Tracy at WSB "the Times partnership doesn't involve any discussion or collaboration on revenue generation at all." She defends the current system in place that features local business on a long, long list of banner ads-- or as she calls it, a business directory. A long, completely unorganized business directory. Anyways, I was hoping to see some collaboration of sorts on advertising and revenue, but it looks like that portion of journalism, arguably the most important considering these journalists want to make money in order to live, has been left out of the experiment.
Digital Media Job
16 years ago
